30-Day Cooling-Off Period · 离婚冷静期(30天)
Article 1077 — Civil Code of the PRC
For divorce by registration, within 30 days after the registry receives the application either spouse may withdraw it. After that period, both spouses must go together within 30 days to collect the divorce certificate; if they do not, the application is treated as withdrawn. (This cooling-off rule applies only to divorce by agreement, not to court/litigation divorce.)
自婚姻登记机关收到离婚登记申请之日起三十日内,任何一方不愿离婚的,可以向登记机关撤回离婚登记申请。前述期限届满后三十日内,双方应当共同到登记机关申请发给离婚证;未共同申请的,视为撤回离婚登记申请。(仅适用于协议离婚登记,不适用于诉讼离婚。)
🚨
Emergency Legal Help · 紧急法律求助
Detained · passport lost · violence · accident 拘留/护照丢失/暴力/事故
›
🧳
Moving to China soon? · 即将来华?
Pre-arrival legal checklist & first 30 days
›
What happened? · 发生了什么?
Start from your situation, not from legal categories · 从您的处境出发,而不是从法律分类出发
💰
My salary has not been paid
工资被拖欠
📄
I was fired / asked to resign
被辞退 / 被要求辞职
🛂
Visa / residence permit problem
签证 / 居留许可问题
🏠
Landlord won't return my deposit
房东不退押金
👮
Police contacted / detained me
被警方联系 / 拘留
🚦
I had a traffic accident
发生交通事故
🤕
I was injured at work
发生工伤
✍️
I need a contract reviewed
需要审查合同
Continue Reading · 最近浏览
✈️
Visa Types for Foreigners
Article 12 · 外国人签证类型
›
📋
Foreign Employee Wrongful Termination Case
外籍员工违法解雇案
›
💼
Written Employment Contract Requirement
Article 10 · 书面劳动合同要求
›
Browse the Law Library See All ›
✈️
Immigration & Visa
出入境与签证
Recent Cases See All ›
CONTRACT
2026-06-24
Foreign Crew Wages Recovered — Ship Arrested and Released in 9 Days
外籍船东欠薪·扣船9天促成和解案
A Liberian ship-management company, owed US$656,400 in crew-management fees by a Marshall Islands shipowner, applied to a Chinese maritime court to arrest the ship when it called at Quanzhou port. The court arrested the 70,000-ton foreign vessel within 24 hours and brokered a US$762,800 settlement in just 9 days; the crew's pay was covered and the ship was released before a typhoon arrived.
Xiamen Maritime Court / 厦门海事法院
Read ›
CONTRACT
2026-06-24
Carrier May Not Invoke Foreign Sanctions to Refuse Cargo
承运人不得以外国制裁为由拒运案
A Hong Kong shipper booked electronics worth about ¥4.99 million from Shanghai to Panama. The Singapore carrier refused to issue the bill of lading, citing the shipper's inclusion on a foreign sanctions list, and later shipped the cargo back. Applying China's Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law, the court held this was a fundamental breach and awarded the shipper full damages plus interest.
Shanghai Maritime Court / 上海海事法院
Read ›
Talk to a Lawyer · 咨询律师
Free consultation — how to ask · 免费咨询 · 咨询路径
›